Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Low-Pitched Whine At Slow Speeds

Views : 3499

Replies : 35

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 28th, 2023, 23:48   #21
TheHungriestBadger
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Feb 18th, 2024 23:05
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Ardleigh, Colchester
Post

Interesting Bob, and thanks for the photos, they've all been really good

I noticed mine had excess thread on each end as well, and that when refitting the cross-member, the mount was the limiting factor, even when it had essentially maximum play... I may have to crawl under again and reinvestigate, making sure that the mount is actually sitting flush against the bracket and cross-member, although visibility is pretty poor in that area.

I may have already put this, but I know that both mounts were the same width/diameter and thickness, yet the cross member was always a few mm out from being square (probably 10mm or 1/2"). I tested numerous times bolting each side in first. It didn't matter which side I bolted in first, it was always super easy (could tighten both bolts into the chassis ~80% by hand if not more. But always when trying to bolt up the other side, the cross-member was always that 1/2" from being square. Again, this was forced into place using a screwdriver as a lever and then starting the threads on the other bolt.

Does that further point to engine shiftage at all (assuming the mount is flush on both faces of course)? The exact reassembly process was:

1) Locate mount thread into trans bracket and tighten nut ~1/4 of the way.
2) Thread cross-member over exhaust and locate other mount thread into hole on cross-member, again tightening nut ~1/4 of the way (tons of play in mount).
3) Bolt cross-member on one side (both bolts, finger tight, with spacer plate).
4) Jam cross-member back square with screwdriver (required a helper in my case, likely because I'm weak) and then thread in other bolt a few threads to hold.
5) Remove screwdriver, thread in final bolt, tightening both bolts and with spacer plate - these two bolts required a socket wrench the whole way to tighten.

Finally, I was able to tighten the nut on the cross-member-side thread of the mount without needing a u-joint on the socket wrench - just a 15mm deep socket and 3/8" short extension. I was pretty sure I needed a u-joint in the removal process, but to be fair, I didn't actually check if I could get away without... Maybe this points more to the mount not being seated correctly?

Maybe I'll try redoing the trans mount myself (with the correct part, and more knowledge on the process) as a first port of call given that'll be the cheapest option, and surely can't make the problem any worse as long as due care is observed?
__________________
1990 Volvo 240 GL Auto "Catalyser" (oOOoh, fancy). B200F, about as original as they come, and all in BLOO. ~140k

My electronics website/blog thing: https://unintegratedcircuit.wixsite....egratedcircuit
TheHungriestBadger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28th, 2023, 23:51   #22
BicycleBoy
Master Member
 

Last Online: Today 10:32
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Wellingborough
Default

Plenty of room: aw70 and a febi after market mount



Bob, you're missing a blind grommet that covers the hole in the crossmember. Stops it rusting out from the inside.
BicycleBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BicycleBoy For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 28th, 2023, 23:56   #23
TheHungriestBadger
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Feb 18th, 2024 23:05
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Ardleigh, Colchester
Default

Bicycle Boy, looks like you've also got the square mount in there (with the offset threads?)? Any advantage to attaching the mount to cross-member before bracket?

Also, agreed, there should be a rubber grommet covering that hole in the cross-member, I have yet to refit mine given it's barely going anywhere.
__________________
1990 Volvo 240 GL Auto "Catalyser" (oOOoh, fancy). B200F, about as original as they come, and all in BLOO. ~140k

My electronics website/blog thing: https://unintegratedcircuit.wixsite....egratedcircuit

Last edited by TheHungriestBadger; Feb 28th, 2023 at 23:57. Reason: Re: Grommet
TheHungriestBadger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1st, 2023, 00:10   #24
BicycleBoy
Master Member
 

Last Online: Today 10:32
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Wellingborough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHungriestBadger View Post
Bicycle Boy, looks like you've also got the square mount in there (with the offset threads?)?
Yup, that't the one for the aw70, two metal teeth on it to grip the bracket.
Quote:
Any advantage to attaching the mount to cross-member before bracket?
Remove the two bolts holding the bracket to the gearbox, and the four bolts and spacers holding the crossmember to the car body, then with the whole doodah on the bench start dicking about changing the rubber mount.

Plenty of opportunity to get fresh with the wire brush and paint when everything is off. Did mine three months ago and look at the muck already.

Last edited by BicycleBoy; Mar 1st, 2023 at 00:12.
BicycleBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BicycleBoy For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 1st, 2023, 08:08   #25
Bob 1967
Master Member
 

Last Online: Apr 23rd, 2024 18:27
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Dublin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BicycleBoy View Post
Plenty of opportunity to get fresh with the wire brush and paint when everything is off. Did mine three months ago and look at the muck already.
Before

After
__________________
Cowboy used to be a trade , now it means lack of one.
Bob 1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1st, 2023, 11:02   #26
Othen
Premier Member
 
Othen's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 15:39
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHungriestBadger View Post
No, the motor mounts are still in one piece so far as I can tell - certainly, the car still drives as smoothly as it did (which was fairly smooth, except for a rumble on deceleration which I lived with since no extra noises over 6k miles).

My only suspicion that I may have done, is that I needed to jack it up quite far (i.e. more than just 1", but probably not more than 3") to force the cross-member back. It seems pretty obvious that something shifted more towards the rear of the car in the process, otherwise it would've all just lined back up again pretty nicely.

My curiosity comes from seeing lots of people say "don't do it or else big damage" but don't state along what kind of lines that big damage is. 'tis all
The only way the motor could move backwards is is one (or both) of the front engine months has let go. This is certainly possible (this one is from my previous 244):



... and isn't necessarily obvious because the motor is pretty heavy. If that has happened it would certainly explain why you suddenly have a new noise. You could put a jack under the sump and see if the motor lifts without the car, or just see if you can move it around a bit with a pry bar. If this is a concern then get the engine mounts changed without delay.

Good fortune,

Abe
__________________
... another lovely day in paradise.

Last edited by Othen; Mar 1st, 2023 at 11:05.
Othen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 1st, 2023, 11:42   #27
Clifford Pope
Not an expert but ...
 

Last Online: Yesterday 12:45
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
Default

I'd suggest that the misalignment at the gearbox end is easily explained by ageing engine mounts. I've always found these difficult to fit. They sag and distort with age, especially the one on the right underneath the oil filter. It is very difficult to avoid oil dripping on it when changing the filter.
Eventually the block comes apart from the plates, but even then it is hard to distinguish a slight sagging from total disconnection because the engine is so heavy. Once the engine has shifted position it requires a lot of heaving and leverage to move it, especially if both mountings have gone. Moving the gearbox end to replace its mount shifts the engine out of place.

In the end I found it easier to unbolt the entire mounting brackets and then fit the new rubber on the bench. Bolt the mounting to the engine block first, then lower the engine a little and guide the bolts into the crossmember.
Clifford Pope is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Clifford Pope For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 1st, 2023, 13:20   #28
Othen
Premier Member
 
Othen's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 15:39
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Othen View Post
The only way the motor could move backwards is is one (or both) of the front engine months has let go. This is certainly possible (this one is from my previous 244):



... and isn't necessarily obvious because the motor is pretty heavy. If that has happened it would certainly explain why you suddenly have a new noise. You could put a jack under the sump and see if the motor lifts without the car, or just see if you can move it around a bit with a pry bar. If this is a concern then get the engine mounts changed without delay.

Good fortune,

Abe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clifford Pope View Post
I'd suggest that the misalignment at the gearbox end is easily explained by ageing engine mounts. I've always found these difficult to fit. They sag and distort with age, especially the one on the right underneath the oil filter. It is very difficult to avoid oil dripping on it when changing the filter.
Eventually the block comes apart from the plates, but even then it is hard to distinguish a slight sagging from total disconnection because the engine is so heavy. Once the engine has shifted position it requires a lot of heaving and leverage to move it, especially if both mountings have gone. Moving the gearbox end to replace its mount shifts the engine out of place.

In the end I found it easier to unbolt the entire mounting brackets and then fit the new rubber on the bench. Bolt the mounting to the engine block first, then lower the engine a little and guide the bolts into the crossmember.
... without having seen the engine, I'm tending to think that Clifford is right and it has shifted on its mounts (probably because one of them has sheared through).

Clifford is right that the easiest was is to undo the 3 nuts at the bottom of one of the mounts from the cross member and lift the engine up with a hoist:



... this was to remove the sump, but the principle is the same. Then remove the aluminium casting you can see here from the motor:



Remove the whole assembly and change the rubber mount on the bench and replace. Then do the other side (don't undo both at the same time, that engine is really heavy!).

It really isn't as difficult as it sounds.

Abe
__________________
... another lovely day in paradise.

Last edited by Othen; Mar 1st, 2023 at 15:52.
Othen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 2nd, 2023, 16:52   #29
TheHungriestBadger
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Feb 18th, 2024 23:05
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Ardleigh, Colchester
Post

Just took some pictures of the engine (looks like it's sagging slightly to me), and the engine mounts on both sides, would be grateful for your wise opinions.

Alternative Links:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mqg...usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/143C...usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fij...usp=share_link
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Engine Sagging.jpg (299.0 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg LHS Engine Mount.jpg (287.2 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg RHS Engine Mount.jpg (286.6 KB, 8 views)
__________________
1990 Volvo 240 GL Auto "Catalyser" (oOOoh, fancy). B200F, about as original as they come, and all in BLOO. ~140k

My electronics website/blog thing: https://unintegratedcircuit.wixsite....egratedcircuit
TheHungriestBadger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TheHungriestBadger For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 2nd, 2023, 17:17   #30
Bob 1967
Master Member
 

Last Online: Apr 23rd, 2024 18:27
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Dublin
Default

This is where the drivers side bracket is attached to the crossmember.
3 12mm nuts.


Newly installed mount on pass side.

Just to give an idea of how it compares to your old ones.

Just did a visual inspection, they are still the same shape.(haven't quashed or settled.) They were done 3 years ago.
__________________
Cowboy used to be a trade , now it means lack of one.

Last edited by Bob 1967; Mar 2nd, 2023 at 17:29.
Bob 1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bob 1967 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
low pitch, noise, transmission mount, volvo 240, whine


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:46.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.