|
700/900 Series General Forum for the Volvo 740, 760, 780, 940, 960 & S/V90 cars |
Information |
|
What's the deal with... the 960?Views : 957 Replies : 14Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Mar 8th, 2020, 13:56 | #1 |
Member
Last Online: Aug 20th, 2023 15:06
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Milton Keynes
|
What's the deal with... the 960?
Hi
I've got a 1995 960 mk2 3.0 (202,000 miles). I've had it for two years and it's been great! Done 16,000 miles in it already. I've heard reports that it's not such a good car for others, heard it's not reliable and very complicated to fix if something goes wrong, although I've never had an issue with that. Does the 960 have a reputation or is this fake news? Is there any common faults that one would expect to occur over 100,000 miles? While we're at it, anyone with some serious mileage on one of these vehicles? Ta |
The Following User Says Thank You to taiwan740 For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 14:35 | #2 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Apr 20th, 2024 18:56
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Selby, North Yorkshire
|
I've a 1997 S90, 3 litre auto, so essentially the same vehicle. I've owned it for 2 years now, taking it from 88,000 to 120,000 miles in that time.
In that time I've changed the front wishbones (advised on the last MOT), the drop links, a headlapmp wiper motor, a front brake calliper, a little piece of dashboard trim around the light switches, a new battery and some tyres. Oh and I needed a new door mirror glass and motor a few weeks back. All of which seems pretty fair for a 23-year-old car that's in daily use. By comparison our S70 in that same period has needed a new exhaust, new front struts, new rear shocks, four new tyres, and a door check strap or two - although to be fair it's a bit up on miles at 220,000 now. I've never had a problem getting parts for the S90, and the car seems to run very well. In their time yes, they were expensive beasts to own and run - about £30,000 to buy new I believe. My only real concern about the car is the fuel consumption - low-to-mid twenties at best, 30mpg on a steady run. I guess that if I ever needed interior trim then that might be an issue, and certainly the engine with it's 24 hydraulic valves wouldn't be the easiest of DIY fixes. Arguably the more straightforward redblock 940 would have the edge there. But I'm loving the smooth understated quality and elegance of the car, and it's a fantastic drive. If one day it does all go wrong then I guess I'll have to think again, but at the moment I'm just enjoying owning what is a very rare car now! Jack |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to capt jack For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 14:51 | #3 |
Member
Last Online: Aug 20th, 2023 15:06
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Milton Keynes
|
Yeah I'm just enjoying it as it is now, there will be a time where parts run out and I just can't fix it, but hopefully not soon, although it doesn't owe me anything, I paid £400 for it two years ago. It's far from mint, which suits me fine. It's a workhorse (although still in decent condition for its age I reckon). The rear nivomat shocks are worn out, i have replacements in the parts room, just its not bothering me that much yet. It gets a bit of a ribbing in the office by the older crowd (I'm 29) who think their german marque is the bees knees, but this doesn't bother me either.
I recently drove up to Scotland on a good run and it got 26.4mpg the whole way, which is pretty rubbish by todays standards, but i'm happy to pay the fuel as I can afford it and it beats being in debt to some insane leasing/finance deal personally. Did not know it had hydraulic lifters - my engine does tick. Has clean oil. Oh well, see what happens. |
The Following User Says Thank You to taiwan740 For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 15:57 | #4 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Apr 20th, 2024 18:56
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Selby, North Yorkshire
|
Sounds like you got a bargain. Even if you broek it for parts tomorrow you'd get your £400 back - and int he meantime you've had 2 years of bargain-price motoring, and in some style.
Ignore the workplace car-park jibes. Your 960 isn't costing you 500 per month in PCP or depreciation - and it's a far better car! Jack |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to capt jack For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 16:20 | #5 |
Trader Volvo in my veins
Last Online: Apr 26th, 2024 23:53
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
|
I have a few 960's both MK1 and MK2 versions. There are pros and cons to both.
The Down side of the 960 is the engine is harder to work on but you do not get silky smooth 6 cylinder power without having a little more complexity to the engine. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to classicswede For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 17:59 | #6 |
Member
Last Online: Mar 13th, 2021 12:16
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Aylesbury
|
I've got a '97 V90 and it's an awesome car. Not a missile but fast enough for todays traffic. BIG boot, comfy seats what more could you want. Who gives a monkeys what the people in the office say. My wife despises it but I'm not bothered. It's not her car. I'm 33 so don't really suit the type of stereotype that the car has but who bloody cares. The only thing I would say is it's a thirsty beast hey ho. You probably knew that before you brought it so I doubt that bothers you to much.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Estate87 For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 18:36 | #7 |
Member
Last Online: Aug 20th, 2023 15:06
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Milton Keynes
|
Yeah I forgot to mention, mine's an estate.
I got close to getting rid of it a while ago in exchange for a Nissan 300ZX (non-turbo) cos I think they look awesome, but in basically every respect that matters to me, the 960 is the better car. Decided to keep it and save myself a few grand. My main concern is finding something I like just as much when it does eventually go =( - I have a 940 as well which I'm very happy with (currently lacking alternator though - on backorder). Think I'll just save my cash and then fix whatever happens with it to be honest. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to taiwan740 For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 20:13 | #8 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 20:24
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
|
Quote:
Oh yeah, don't run it on cheap supermarket fuel either!
__________________
Cheers Dave Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........ |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 22:45 | #9 |
Member
Last Online: Mar 13th, 2021 12:16
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Aylesbury
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estate87 For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2020, 23:04 | #10 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 20:24
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
|
Improved economy, compression, cleaner engine inside, cleaner emissions, revives weepy oil seals (not leaky), smoother running and so on.
Dip and analyse the oil in either of my beasts now and you'll find when i do the oil/filter changes, the first litre that goes in each time is ATF-U, topped up with 10W40 semi-synth. One of my beasts has 24 valves with hydraulic tappets, the has 12 valves with soldi tappets but i use it in both. Just found the emissions sheet from last years MoT on my other beast, CO 0.00% and HC 43ppm - that car is about to have it's 26th birthday. My 760 isn't much different, it's had the MoT tester hunting for a non-existenet cat more than once! That's 32 y/o with 226k on the clock, both cars are 90 degree V6s, non turbo
__________________
Cheers Dave Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|