Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "General Topics" > General Volvo and Motoring Discussions

Notices

General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Rust: Ford vs Volvo

Views : 2261

Replies : 35

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 13th, 2022, 18:40   #1
T5R92011
FCW Auto Service
 
T5R92011's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:52
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Gloucester
Default Rust: Ford vs Volvo

Working on a customer's Ford Focus not too long ago.
Now, for reference, it was a 2008 model and had just passed 100,000 miles.

So, 13-14 years old.

I remember shaking my head noticing the strut towers whilst I was pulling the spark plugs out.....






And then, comparing same area with my first gen P80 car....(V70) which is now 22 years old and has done 250,000 miles and is 8 years older....

I can also say that my previous S40 T5 (sitting on same chassis as the above focus, and slighty older 2007 '57'-plate) had zero rust in those areas. These Fords are just not built to last at all.

__________________
FCW Auto Service (Gloucester)
https://www.fcw-autoservice.com

Last edited by T5R92011; Jan 13th, 2022 at 20:11.
T5R92011 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to T5R92011 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 13th, 2022, 19:09   #2
Familyman 90
The Brit Brick
 
Familyman 90's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2023 10:39
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Warwickshire
Default

Excellent pictures, very illustrative. It's a shame, because Ford have made some dynamically excellent cars in recent years, and theyre far from being cheap any more.

They don't exactly sit upon the same chassis. Some components are shared, or more likely modified onto the Volvo which minimises design costs, but the "platform" is an architectural concept thather than a of physical piece sheet metal.

Scalable platforms work in the same way, but take the dimensional relationships further so stuff can be made bigger or smaller and still be produced on the same line.

There will be certain dimensional crossovers. For example, door hinges, suspension pick up points, engine mounts, etc, will share the same relationship in 3D space. This means suspension components engines, etc, transmissions, can be shared between the designs and even built in the same production line with minimal disruption.

As such, Volvo are able to design their monocoque to drain better, to use superior quality steel, and to use whatever anticorrosion processes they fancy instead of being restricted to directly using Fords sheet metal with all its shortcomings. Thankfully Volvo retained sufficient freedom of action under Ford ownership to be able to do this, and weren't forced into the indignity of having their products plop off a Ford production line on alternatve days with the Focus or Mundano.

Indeed, considering how badly Ford mismanaged their ownership of the PAG companies Volvo did pretty will to retain some integrity with their product.
__________________
2005 C70 2.4T Collection convertible. 40,000 mile sunny day toy.
Familyman 90 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Familyman 90 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 13th, 2022, 21:13   #3
TeamG
Master Member
 

Last Online: Mar 26th, 2024 23:37
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: CARDIFF
Default

I’ve had Fords with rust advisories on their first MOT at three years old (and a Mazda 3 at four years old). Pretty shocking really and the reason I’d never buy another Ford. Built to last 5-7 years max.
__________________
_________________________________________
2017 XC60 D4 AWD R Design Nav
2011 V70 1.6 DRIVe SE (sold)
2008 V50 2.0D SE (sold)
TeamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15th, 2022, 19:07   #4
Tannaton
Bungling Amateur
 
Tannaton's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 20:51
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Beverley, East Yorks
Default

Some Volvo's might have had Ford chassis components but they were all treated and painted in Volvo factories.

I did a post a few years ago that I was helping my wife's friend find a £2.5k diesel runaround. We looked at about 10 - including 2 S40 2.0D which were my recommendation. Both the S40's were in significantly better condition than the Golfs and Focus we looked at - one Golf (56 plate but this was 4-5 years ago) had even had the sills welded.

The only time that I've really regretted not working harder at school was a few months into ownership of a 2012 Ford Ranger - because I couldn't afford a Hilux of the same age. The Ranger (designed by Ford in Australia) is a really well designed and useful car - but appalling build quality and consequently poor reliability.
__________________
2011 XC90 D5 Executive
2003 C70 T5 GT
2012 Ford Ranger XL SC
1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500
1976 Massey Ferguson 135
Tannaton is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tannaton For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 15th, 2022, 22:16   #5
Turbodave
VOC Member
 

Last Online: Mar 19th, 2024 20:44
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Fife
Default

You're comparing two cars. Just two. and two completely different ones at that.

Not all Ford Focus will have corrosion there and likewise, some will have gone off to meet their maker because of that issue already so really, it's not quite as simple as that and lets be fair, Volvo haven't exactly excelled at fending off corrosion - see for instance, 850 wings, S60 / V70 strut towers, P80 rear seat mounts, jacking points and the like.

You can argue that yours is fine, but others... they aren't and the same applies to a Ford Focus. Some will be worse than others depending on age, usage and the care they've had over the years. Granted Ford aren't reknowned for their rust proofing, but they're not alone.

As far as the rust on the Focus strut towers goes, doesn't look any worse than that on my 08 V50 and to be honest, looks a damn sight better than the S40 I looked at in a breaker today where the outer section of the strut tower looked like a good poke would make it very light and airy.
Turbodave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16th, 2022, 19:43   #6
T5R92011
FCW Auto Service
 
T5R92011's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:52
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Gloucester
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbodave View Post
You're comparing two cars. Just two. and two completely different ones at that.
Yes granted I am comparing two very different cars, but anytime I've had to work on any kind of Ford, they never look great from underneath.

Perhaps Volvos are better at concealing their rust, but from the ones I've owned, especially pre-ford era, they generally seem to hold up a lot better than most brands.
__________________
FCW Auto Service (Gloucester)
https://www.fcw-autoservice.com
T5R92011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16th, 2022, 19:58   #7
andy_d
Premier Member
 
andy_d's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 25th, 2024 22:43
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: birmingham
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T5R92011 View Post
Yes granted I am comparing two very different cars, but anytime I've had to work on any kind of Ford, they never look great from underneath.

Perhaps Volvos are better at concealing their rust, but from the ones I've owned, especially pre-ford era, they generally seem to hold up a lot better than most brands.
and you wonder why they earnt the name "dagenham dustbins" ,,,
__________________
940s - 2l / 92 < gone&missed s401.8 xs auto <gone >V50 2.4SE Geartronic aka "the new money pit"
"skyship007 has now been successfully added to your ignore list. "."
andy_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16th, 2022, 22:08   #8
Sotosound
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 08:24
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Aylesbury
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy_d View Post
and you wonder why they earnt the name "dagenham dustbins" ,,,
That term goes back much further than I care to remember and refers to a time when Ford cars didn't have wheel arch liners, and all the water and salt and mud thrown up by the front tyres found their way into various nice little traps where rust would germinate and bloom, leading to new air intakes and added ventilation for the outer and inner wings.

I owned two true Dagenham dustbins.The second one, a Ford Consul 2.5 V6 estate, appeared to include an unsuccessful attempt at gull-wing doors inasmuch as the door skins had largely separated from the doorframes due to rust inside the bottoms of the doors. This was in a six year-old car.

Things have certainly improved since then, and there are still some pristine early third generation Mondeos around.
Sotosound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17th, 2022, 14:45   #9
Tannaton
Bungling Amateur
 
Tannaton's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 20:51
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Beverley, East Yorks
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbodave View Post
You're comparing two cars. Just two. and two completely different ones at that.

Not all Ford Focus will have corrosion there and likewise, some will have gone off to meet their maker because of that issue already so really, it's not quite as simple as that and lets be fair, Volvo haven't exactly excelled at fending off corrosion - see for instance, 850 wings, S60 / V70 strut towers, P80 rear seat mounts, jacking points and the like.

You can argue that yours is fine, but others... they aren't and the same applies to a Ford Focus. Some will be worse than others depending on age, usage and the care they've had over the years. Granted Ford aren't reknowned for their rust proofing, but they're not alone.

As far as the rust on the Focus strut towers goes, doesn't look any worse than that on my 08 V50 and to be honest, looks a damn sight better than the S40 I looked at in a breaker today where the outer section of the strut tower looked like a good poke would make it very light and airy.
Very rational but next time you are out driving through a city - have a look out for any Volvo and any Ford of say an 04 to 55 plate. I haven't quote done that but I bet you will find the Volvo's will be better lasting.
__________________
2011 XC90 D5 Executive
2003 C70 T5 GT
2012 Ford Ranger XL SC
1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500
1976 Massey Ferguson 135
Tannaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17th, 2022, 18:18   #10
MDS40
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Mar 19th, 2024 11:45
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Berkshire
Default

My 55 plate 2006 looks nothing like the focus. ( 93k miles )
In fact it's totally rust free.

Probably the best and most reliable car i have ever had in 50 years of driving, which includes many much newer cars.
Purchased 4.5 years ago for what was a bit above the market rate but never looked back.

Well that's the kiss of death. !!!!!!!
__________________
2006 S40 2.4 SE Auto. Ruby Red. 83K Miles

Some previous cars include: Jaguar x type: Mazda 6 : Mazda 626: Ford Sierra 2.0: Toyota Celica ST 1600 : Hillman Avenger: Triumph Spitfire:
Oh and a Volvo 340 GL 1984 company car from new.
MDS40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.