Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > V40/XC '12>17 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

V40 wheel arch inserts - corrosion traps?

Views : 2605

Replies : 19

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Dec 14th, 2014, 15:12   #1
anton differing
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Aug 29th, 2020 11:47
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Liestal, Switzerland
Default V40 wheel arch inserts - corrosion traps?

Hello, I acquried a V40CC in September and I notice that the rear wheel arches have inserts made of what appears to be a stiff felt, presumably to absorb stones thrown up by the tyres. What concerns me, however, is that these are not a tight fit - there are gaps through which road muck and salt in winter could pass and accumulate, providing, it seems to me, the possibility for long-term corrosion.

Any thoughts on this, or am I worrying unnecessarily?
anton differing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14th, 2014, 19:27   #2
Ninja59
Probably Akita's Toyboy..
 
Ninja59's Avatar
 

Last Online: Dec 27th, 2023 22:24
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A House.
Default

Technically speaking it could be worse if held against the metal as the dampness will then be held against the metal and lead to further corrosion.

The easiest way to avoid it is to remove the liners themselves and use a dinitrol or bilt hamber dynax product between the metal and the liner ensure plenty goes where the liner meets the arch itself.
Ninja59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14th, 2014, 21:20   #3
anton differing
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Aug 29th, 2020 11:47
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Liestal, Switzerland
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninja59 View Post
Technically speaking it could be worse if held against the metal as the dampness will then be held against the metal and lead to further corrosion.

The easiest way to avoid it is to remove the liners themselves and use a dinitrol or bilt hamber dynax product between the metal and the liner ensure plenty goes where the liner meets the arch itself.
Thanks, but if there were no way in and the liner were suitably waterproof, it would be no problem. Other manufacturers use a thick mastic that retains it elasticity - this takes both stone punishment and acts as a sound deadener. Not sure why Volvo, which has a reputation for durability, hasn't used this approach. Cost paring?
anton differing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17th, 2014, 16:53   #4
RoyMacDonald
VOC Member
 
RoyMacDonald's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 1st, 2023 11:27
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rye, East Sussex
Default

All my Volvos have had wheel arches for the last 34 years (Long before most other manufacturers) and I've never had any rust problems caused by them. Extra Dinitrol never goes amiss though if you want to give it a little more TLC.

It's normal practice for Volvo to ventilate them since 1991 or thereabouts by the way. Since they started using zinc plated steel bodies.

Maybe I should add my 1984 245 is still running strong.
__________________
1984 245 SE 1986 345 SE Auto
1991 940 TD Auto 2003 XC90 D5 SE AWD Geartronic2002 V70 D5 SE Auto 2014 V40 D2 SE Tiptronic Cross Country 2017 V40 D2 Cross Country Geartronic Pro 2015 XC60 D5 Polestar SE Lux Nav AWD Geartronic

Last edited by RoyMacDonald; Dec 17th, 2014 at 16:56.
RoyMacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18th, 2014, 14:15   #5
Rooster
Speed freak
 
Rooster's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 3rd, 2020 22:04
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Default

I think they use them rather than plastic as a first line of sound deadening from then wheel noise,

I think alot of modern cars die of electrical failure or become uneconomical to repair long before the bodys corrode
__________________
04 XC90 D5 --- Big bus
00 pug 306HDi --- Run about
88 pug 309GTi --- Project track car
07 CB600 Hornet --- 2 wheel fun
Rooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18th, 2014, 16:50   #6
RoyMacDonald
VOC Member
 
RoyMacDonald's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 1st, 2023 11:27
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rye, East Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anton differing View Post
Thanks, but if there were no way in and the liner were suitably waterproof, it would be no problem. Other manufacturers use a thick mastic that retains it elasticity - this takes both stone punishment and acts as a sound deadener. Not sure why Volvo, which has a reputation for durability, hasn't used this approach. Cost paring?
Wheel arch protectors have always worked better than underseal. British Leyland always used underseal! I switched to Volvo after getting sick of body rot. If the arches were closed off completely (not possible) they would still suffer from condensation causing rust. Hence the reason they are ventilated.

I don't think they are made of felt by the way. Looks like some kind of recycled plastic to me. Manufacturers have recycle their old cars now.

I have bought aftermarket wheel arch protectors for cars that didn't have them in the far distant past.
__________________
1984 245 SE 1986 345 SE Auto
1991 940 TD Auto 2003 XC90 D5 SE AWD Geartronic2002 V70 D5 SE Auto 2014 V40 D2 SE Tiptronic Cross Country 2017 V40 D2 Cross Country Geartronic Pro 2015 XC60 D5 Polestar SE Lux Nav AWD Geartronic

Last edited by RoyMacDonald; Dec 18th, 2014 at 16:55.
RoyMacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 19th, 2014, 12:30   #7
anton differing
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Aug 29th, 2020 11:47
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Liestal, Switzerland
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyMacDonald View Post
Wheel arch protectors have always worked better than underseal. British Leyland always used underseal! I switched to Volvo after getting sick of body rot. If the arches were closed off completely (not possible) they would still suffer from condensation causing rust. Hence the reason they are ventilated.

I don't think they are made of felt by the way. Looks like some kind of recycled plastic to me. Manufacturers have recycle their old cars now.

I have bought aftermarket wheel arch protectors for cars that didn't have them in the far distant past.
Thanks, Roy. It depends very much on the underseal. A good one will retain its elasticity and not go hard and crack, letting water and air in.

Nobody can say that Volvo doesn't answer customers' questions. I posed the question to Volvo UK, purely because I wasn't sure that the local dealer could handle technical questions in English. I got a nice mail from Volvo UK, who said that, because it hadn't sold the car, it couldn't answer, but it referred it to Sweden, which in turn referred it to Volvo Schweiz, which said it would make sure I got an answer in English.

So, I visited the dealer and they were ready for me. I pointed out what I saw as a problem, and they said that they coat the wheel arch behind the liner with a waterproof wax compound, and therefore that anything getting past the liner would cause no problems.

Your point about ventilation is a good one. However, I was concerned about dirt and salt getting past the liners - they would most certainly not evaporate, but potentially accumulate and provide nuclei for future corrosion. The wax would certainly keep it at bay, but even silicone-based waxes harden over time and crack. Hopefully by then I'll be past caring!
anton differing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21st, 2014, 18:59   #8
RoyMacDonald
VOC Member
 
RoyMacDonald's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 1st, 2023 11:27
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rye, East Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anton differing View Post
Thanks, Roy. It depends very much on the underseal. A good one will retain its elasticity and not go hard and crack, letting water and air in.

Nobody can say that Volvo doesn't answer customers' questions. I posed the question to Volvo UK, purely because I wasn't sure that the local dealer could handle technical questions in English. I got a nice mail from Volvo UK, who said that, because it hadn't sold the car, it couldn't answer, but it referred it to Sweden, which in turn referred it to Volvo Schweiz, which said it would make sure I got an answer in English.

So, I visited the dealer and they were ready for me. I pointed out what I saw as a problem, and they said that they coat the wheel arch behind the liner with a waterproof wax compound, and therefore that anything getting past the liner would cause no problems.

Your point about ventilation is a good one. However, I was concerned about dirt and salt getting past the liners - they would most certainly not evaporate, but potentially accumulate and provide nuclei for future corrosion. The wax would certainly keep it at bay, but even silicone-based waxes harden over time and crack. Hopefully by then I'll be past caring!
Volvo use Dinitrol. The right type for each situation. There is a thick black underseal one they use on the underbody. Modern Volvo's do not rust. I've seen Audi's and Mercs rust but never a Volvo.
__________________
1984 245 SE 1986 345 SE Auto
1991 940 TD Auto 2003 XC90 D5 SE AWD Geartronic2002 V70 D5 SE Auto 2014 V40 D2 SE Tiptronic Cross Country 2017 V40 D2 Cross Country Geartronic Pro 2015 XC60 D5 Polestar SE Lux Nav AWD Geartronic
RoyMacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RoyMacDonald For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 22nd, 2014, 08:53   #9
Ninja59
Probably Akita's Toyboy..
 
Ninja59's Avatar
 

Last Online: Dec 27th, 2023 22:24
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A House.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyMacDonald View Post
Volvo use Dinitrol. The right type for each situation. There is a thick black underseal one they use on the underbody. Modern Volvo's do not rust. I've seen Audi's and Mercs rust but never a Volvo.
It depends how define "rust" as I can definitely say I have seen rust developing on the rear of the chassis legs of our previous C30 where the underseal completely failed - no accidents or incidents (as we had it from new) the car never saw a bodyshop either.

Looking at it from memory though this looked more to be developing inside out which would imply a lack of cavity protection, but either way in parts the rear of the car was lovely and brown.

Stating that they do not rust is a bit of a cop out I feel, additionally with all of the undertrays and covers in place it is not always obvious what could be lurking behind them.

I do have experience with dinitrol but as any underseal if not applied correctly it is useless - apply it over dirt or dampness it will just worsen the problem rather than preventing it.
Ninja59 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ninja59 For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 22nd, 2014, 15:33   #10
anton differing
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Aug 29th, 2020 11:47
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Liestal, Switzerland
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninja59 View Post
Looking at it from memory though this looked more to be developing inside out which would imply a lack of cavity protection, but either way in parts the rear of the car was lovely and brown.
That's the stuff you've really got to worry about. Surface rust is unsightly, but rarely problematic. But when surfaces start to bubble, you know there's a major mess under there.

I'm particularly conscious of the rust problem, because we lost our previous car to rust. It was a '94 Opel Astra Caravan, and it was a mighty machine, serving us faithfully for over 20 years and 346,000Km. But the rust got it - repairing it would have cost something like 10 times the car's actual value.

We now have this gorgeous V40CC and we want it to last as long as possible!
anton differing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.