|
200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars |
Information |
|
New (to me) 1980 Volvo 244Views : 2036827 Replies : 4092Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 6th, 2020, 16:16 | #961 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 06:33
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...d-rates-tables |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 16:28 | #962 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Oct 26th, 2023 20:42
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thurrock
|
Quote:
Well that is something then. Good catch Othen. Comrade Stephen Edwin . |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Stephen Edwin For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 16:42 | #963 |
Master Member
Last Online: Today 08:30
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London and Cambridge
|
Hi- on the subject of spares, some headlight glass for your pretty rare headlights just popped up on Facebook.
Cheers |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bugjam1999 For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 16:46 | #964 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 06:33
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
That is interesting and may well be worth following up. I don't have a Facebook account (or any other social media type things - I'm too fixed in my ways for that) - is there any other way I could see the ad (or maybe the guy has a phone number or email address I could use to contact him?). Stay safe, Alan |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 17:06 | #965 | |
VOC Member since 1986
Last Online: Today 08:25
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leicestershire
|
Quote:
What it has shown me is how dramatically the relationship between fuel, fixed costs, repairs and servicing has changed since I retired. When I was working, fuel was by far my biggest expense; now it is the smallest. Fixed costs were ammortised over a much higher mileage, and servicing was done on mileage. whereas, at 3000 miles per year, it is now time-based. Tracking fuel consumption, especially when doing upwards of 1000 miles per week, can reveal trends that may indicate that all is not quite well with the car. I once detected a leak from an incorrectly fitted fuel filter on my 944 following a service that way, so it has definitely paid off! Regards, John.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana ..... |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to john.wigley For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 17:14 | #966 | |
Master Member
Last Online: Today 08:30
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London and Cambridge
|
Quote:
Cheers |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bugjam1999 For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 17:17 | #967 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 06:33
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 17:27 | #968 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 06:33
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
That is an excellent story about the 944 John, I bet the service manager got a shock! Like you, fuel has become a much smaller expense. Between 7 vehicles (3 cars, 4 bikes) I should think I do no more than 12,000 miles/year (less this year with the kung 'flu). I don't keep records, but if I average 40 MPG across the fleet that is about 300 gallons of various premium petrol, diesel and Morrison's very cheapest per year, or about 1,400 litres - say £1,500. Most of my vehicles have stopped depreciating now, but the capital loss on the two mainstream cars (Porsche and Skoda) would come to quite a bit more than £1,500. Stay safe, Alan |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 6th, 2020, 20:25 | #969 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 01:10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
|
Painfully heavy fuel consumption Alan.
Until about the end of August last year, it was doing about 26-27mpg, even on my short runs. Then after checking the air filter one day because i kept getting whiffs of petrol and then checking/adjusting the CO (as i thought to 1%) and renewing the air filter as it was black, i put the slight power loss down to running leaner. Imagine my surprise when a couple of moths later at the MoT, it showed up 0.46% CO! A bit lean - the specs are 1% +/-0.5% CO which means it wasn't far off but i think just lean enough to cause pinking which the knock sensors would have picked up and retarded the ignition timing accordingly. Retarded timing will cause heavy fuel consumption and also running lean will mean the throttle needs opening wider for the same speed which in turn, reduces the efficiency. Anyway, i didn't think much more after the low emissions on the MoT until recently. I then remembered the knock sensors and deicded to investigate. It read 1% CO on the Gastester but i accidentally tapped the top and the needle dropped to 0.3-0.4% CO instead. I tweaked the mixture back up to 1.1-1.2% and the engine is now much smoother and more eager, hopefully the timing is no longer retarded and it's more efficient! I do have a couple of other things to investigate if the economy doesn't improve but so far, that seems the most likely bet! Quote:
__________________
Cheers Dave Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........ |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post: |
May 7th, 2020, 05:32 | #970 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 06:33
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
It does seem odd that a leaner mixture might reduce fuel economy - but I suppose that is just an unintended consequence of electronic control systems. I hope that has solved your issue - 27 MPG is a good result for such a big car. Stay safe, Alan |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|
|