|
200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars |
Information |
|
Electric powerViews : 1852 Replies : 20Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Aug 10th, 2013, 10:19 | #21 | |
Premier Member
|
Quote:
If you harness the energy liberated in step 2 to drive the vehicle, then you need some other source of energy for step 1. That would most likely come either from burning some sort of fuel (petrol, methanol etc) or from battery power - in which case you're back to exactly the same problems as with standard ICE or electric vehicles. The only way that you could really be zero-carbon would be if you used onboard solar cells to generate the energy for step 1 - but then it's not obvious that this method is better than using onboard solar cells to charge the batteries of an electric vehicle. On the basis that all energy conversions are wasteful (i.e. not 100% efficient), it's almost inevitably better to skip step 2 and just use the source of energy that you're using for step 1 to power the vehicle directly. Bottom line, unfortunately, is that hydrogen is not a fuel in the conventional sense, it's more a way of storing energy that you generate by other means (it's an "energy vector" in the technical jargon). If you want to be pedantic, that's true of oil as well, solar energy being the original source of the energy locked up in the oil - but it was all done millions of years ago, so it's "free" to us... Here endeth the chemistry lesson.
__________________
1989 740 GL 2.0 estate 2000 V40 2.0 (gone) 2005 Toyota Avensis 2.0 estate (gone) 2012 Ford Mondeo 2.2 TDCi estate 1999 Land Rover Discovery 2 TD5 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|