|
850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General Forum for the 850 and P80-platform 70-series models |
Information |
|
[Engine 850 2.0 LPT] Mysteriously high fuel consumptionViews : 3522 Replies : 18Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Oct 21st, 2012, 16:58 | #11 | ||||
Junior Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2014 11:54
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jessheim
|
Thanks for good inputs, all! As I'm probably not the only one with this or similar problems, I'll try to go forth in a logical and consistent manner (I did say try), so that this thread may also have some value as future reference for others.
Quote:
Quote:
Is the coolant temp gauge and the EMC supplied from the same sensor, or are there two different sensors? Ambient temp sensor: Computer displays correct ambient temp at all times. Is it the same sensor for fuel/air-mix, or a different one? MAF: How do I test it? FPR: 3 bar above manifold pressure at the Schrader valve, is that it? Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Norwegian For This Useful Post: |
Oct 21st, 2012, 21:18 | #12 |
Senior Member
Last Online: Dec 24th, 2014 20:25
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sussex
|
FPR: 3 bar above manifold pressure at the Schrader valve, is that it?
That's the measurement? Or are you describing the regulator? What does the pressure do at ignition off? |
Oct 21st, 2012, 21:32 | #13 | |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2014 11:54
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jessheim
|
Quote:
My neighbour has a complete workshop and I believe he's got a professional fuel pressure kit, too. Will measure as soon as he has the time to help me. |
|
Jul 9th, 2013, 21:44 | #14 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2014 11:54
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jessheim
|
Still working this issue - some updates:
- Fuel pressure ok, vacuum regulation works well (35-45 psi depending on throttle position) - Coolant temp sensor works well, gives the expected resistance values at different temps (found a chart somewhere). - Lambda regulates quickly, but is covered with soot - MAF cleaned with special CRC MAF-cleaner, but it wasn't really dirty and cleaning made no difference at all. - Throttle house cleaned, but again, not really dirty and made no difference. - purge valve doesn't appear to leak (no suction on canister side), but may not open as it should - no ticking when starting the engine, however that would be an environmental problem, not an mpg-problem, right? Emission check @ 2000 rpm: CO % vol: 0,01 CO2 % vol: 15,4 HC ppm vol: 9 O2 % vol: 0,07 Lambda: 1.004 AFR: 14,8 ... all of which is wonderful, but it doesn't explain this: 23 mpg long term (last 2000 km, mixed driving), nigh impossible to get more. And there is still the soot problem, as well as the lack of power. No wheel spin even at stand-still, full kickdown. Still no fault codes or EML, but my reader can't access live values or long term fuel trim. I have put in an instrument cluster with a boost gauge. Needle will go about 1/3 of the way, maybe slightly more at full throttle and 5000+ revs. Things to do: - Check vacuum lines again - Rebuild turbo. That is really only because I have the parts and want to see the inside of it, not because I have any indications that it is particularly bad. |
Jul 9th, 2013, 22:06 | #15 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
|
Without checking back through the thread, have you checked/changed the TCV??
|
Jul 10th, 2013, 07:34 | #16 | |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2014 11:54
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jessheim
|
Quote:
I experimented a bit with a manual boost controller, which brought up the boost pressure at high revs (3500-4000 and up), but did nothing for the mpg and low end power. I then got a BCS off Ebay a few months back, which again did bring the boost up just a little bit, but nothing in the low end and no change in mpg. Waste gate opening pressure is checked and within limits, btw. As for the injectors: We have pretty good quality petrol here. I've added injector cleaner at every tanking anyway for some months, but no apparent change. |
|
Jul 10th, 2013, 08:38 | #17 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
|
Interesting!
So how was the boost dump being controlled on the original setup (original to you anyway)? I'll have to have a look at VIDA to see what it has listed and the setup. |
Jul 10th, 2013, 11:21 | #18 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2014 11:54
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jessheim
|
The way it was connected, the boost nipple on the turbine housing was connected directly to the wastegate actuator, and the dump valve to the vacuum tree. I've since inserted the BCS between the boost nipple and the wastegate actuator, resulting in a small increase in turbo boost.
|
Jul 10th, 2013, 12:55 | #19 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2014 11:54
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jessheim
|
A quite illuminating article on emission analysis: http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/h56.pdf
A pre-cat exhaust leak can cause the symptoms I experience, while the cat alter the emission values so they appear to be normal. The long term fuel trim value will certainly be helpful now. Will have to get it read somewhere. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|