|
200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars |
![]() |
|
Redblock CamsViews : 3101 Replies : 28Users Viewing This Thread : |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Oct 28th, 2023 12:30
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dereham
|
![]() Quote:
As you have all confirmed, no point in fitting the emission cam from the 740 and the T cam already in it is probably not much better. I have an A and possible lead on a V from a friend, so either of those will be the way to go. The engine is going in a 260 shell, and will be used for daily driving rather than drifting or towing.M46/ 3.5 diff on 185/65 15s should be ok. But it would be nice to be able to overtake! Do you all reckon the Renix distributor from the 240 will work with the LH? After all, the advance and coil trigger comes via the ECU for both systems. It would so easy to fit an electronic distributor and Stromberg, but the badge on the back says Fuel Injection... And, no, I don't want a turbo or a whiteblock just yet, though the latter has its appeal. Thanks for all the replies, Jim. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Trader Volvo in my veins
Last Online: Jun 13th, 2024 23:23
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
|
![]()
The build makes sense now.
Cam I would use the A cam you have but it the V is cheap go for that There is no point spending out on a cam that is not going to see you much gain and not point in a lumpy race cam for a road car Ignition Starting from worst to best 1) basic points distributor 2) renix system 3) kjet hall sensor distributor 4) LH ignition system 5) 123tune distributor The Renix is a pain to change the crank sensor on and good quality king leads are in short supply. I have some but not the best quality. For a simple injection system you could fit Kjet. The downside is they can suffer with air leaks around the injectors and not as good on fuel. I would use a complete LH2.4 setup tbh as a complete package |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Oct 28th, 2023 12:30
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dereham
|
![]()
thanks,
so the LH with an A cam seems favourite. No way do I want a renix. Next hiccup is the fuel pump. The 260 main one is seized anyway, I was hoping to use the complete 740 LH system from the donor car (which runs well but has terrible piston slap/little end noise, and the distributor is in the wrong place).Keeping it simple and reliable is the aim, but without the fuel costs and maintenance of an old DVG carb. Cheers, Jim. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Master Member
Last Online: Jun 3rd, 2024 19:50
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Eindhoven
|
![]() Quote:
In my project the 531 will be skimmed for 0,8 mm to total height of 146 -/- 0,8 which should result in approx 10 comp. (so very safe for both 95 and obviously LPG) Your 2,5" stst exhaust will be hopefully a good investment. Look forward picking it up next week. But I had a look in a 940 with modded B230FB engine. That one is skimmed 1,4 mm which makes it horroble on 95 but LPG goes nice. When revving this one with a folkrace cam the restiction is to be found in the inlet. The guy who did the mod claimed that the KJet inlet would help another 10-15Hp for improved air-intake assisted by 850/960m throttle) But my plans are running the D- Cam and go for torque in the lower range which seems to be very nice on a B230 N/A engine with this set up. The engine will get a set of chips spec. designed for the B230FB with D-cam. A wasted spark seems to be another improvement for the economy so will be there also. I will be aiming for atleast 10 km/ltr (sorry don't have the convertion to mpg) In due time I will start a topic on this but not to the extend Steve and John H do with their projects! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to skidje For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#15 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Jun 13th, 2024 16:50
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Swineshead/Salford
|
![]()
I have a modded kjet manifold with 960 throttle body and it did give a good increase but mine's a turbo. The other restriction are the exhuast valves but again for a NA it's barely worth it changing them.
__________________
new engine! new car! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Master Member
Last Online: Jun 3rd, 2024 19:50
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Eindhoven
|
![]() Quote:
BR |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Nov 22nd, 2015 07:42
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: aylesbury
|
![]()
just out of interest, whats the standard cam on a late 940 lpt?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
VOC Member
|
![]()
Hi skidje, off topic, but Steve said you might be in Yorkshire soon. When is that? Hopefully you can call in to see us and look at the projects!
John |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Jun 13th, 2024 16:50
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Swineshead/Salford
|
![]()
The lpt is the T cam. Good for low down torque, that's about it. The exhaust valve is a restriction whether it's NA or turbo.
__________________
new engine! new car! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Master Member
Last Online: Jun 3rd, 2024 19:50
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Eindhoven
|
![]()
Will let you know. Around tuesday/wednesday next week. Find me a nice rear seat blue velours/pluche for a saloon and i'll certainly come by in huddersfield....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|