Quote:
Originally Posted by Familyman 90
Sorry, I have owned all 3 flavours simultaneously and my first hand experience over more than 150,000 miles in each of them would suggest that, is simply incorrect. The economy improves with each generation, and the 200 is markedly better than the 163, which one would expect from an engine with greater volumetric efficiency and an extra cog in the box.
|
I had in my head that the 163 was the most economical - but I've never owned a 200BHP MY2012-> hence I would graciously defer to your real life experience.